
Abstract On October 5, 1988, Chileans decided by plebiscite to oust General Pinochet from power and have free presidential elections in 1989. This article describes the projections that the authors made for the results of the plebiscite from early returns. From a statistical point of view, what made these projections different from those made in other countries was the complete lack of historic data. Furthermore, the Pinochet government carried out a campaign to discredit the projection effort. Uncertainty about both the data and the unpredictable political climate on the night of the plebiscite influenced the choice of the statistical methodology. The predictions, based on a 10% sample of the first one-third of the votes counted, were within one-half a percentage point of the true outcome. The described methodology could prove useful in projections of other elections that will take place under similar conditions (e.g., in Eastern Europe).
Election, Projection, Stratification, Prediction, Sampling
Election, Projection, Stratification, Prediction, Sampling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
