
Abstract We consider an errors in variables model in which the ‘true’ part of the determining variable is generated by a simple forecasting mechanism. It is shown that the Least Squares errors in variables bias can be interpreted in terms of the parameters of the forecasting mechanism; and that the ‘standard’ result for this bias may no longer hold in this situation. An empirical illustration of the results is given.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
