
doi: 10.2307/2233085
This note corrects a mistake in my paper 'The Demand for Military Expenditure', this JOURNAL vol go, December I980, pp. 8I1-20. The structural parameters of the 'Security Function' are wrongly derived from the estimated coefficients on p. 8i6. This error, which has serious repercussions for the interpretation of the results, was pointed out to me by Mark Franklin, a parttime M.Sc. student at Birkbeck, then at the Ministry of Defence. The model describes the process by which a 'rational' UK state sets the level of military expenditure. Its 'tastes' for Security S and real civilian expenditure C are summarised in a CES social welfare function:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
