Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Externalism and Knowledge of Content

Authors: John Gibbons;

Externalism and Knowledge of Content

Abstract

Many believe that content externalism is inconsistent with commonsense views about our knowledge of the contents of our own thoughts.' Content externalism is the view that the propositional contents of an individual's thoughts do not supervene on the intrinsic properties of that individual. Relations between you and your social and physical environment partly determine the contents of your thoughts.2 But if what determines the content of your thoughts lies partly outside your mind, it might seem that you have to investigate your social and physical environment before you can know the content of your thoughts. If such investigation were necessary, our knowledge of our own mind would be much less direct and much less warranted than we ordinarily believe. How do we connect content externalism with failures of selfknowledge? I believe that water is wet. This first-order belief about the world is subject to the limitations of ordinary empirical knowledge. But I also believe that I believe that water is wet. Apart from cases of self-deception or conceptual confusion, it is difficult to see how I could be wrong about this second-order belief about my own mind. Even if I am wrong about the world, I know what I am thinking. But if I had grown up on Twin Earth, I would now be confidently asserting that I know that I believe that twin-water is wet. I cannot tell through introspection whether I grew up on Earth or Twin Earth, and there is no qualitative difference between believing that water is wet and believing that twin-water is wet. So how do I know which one I believe? We typically do not investigate our environment, find that water

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!