
doi: 10.2307/2171963
handle: 1814/16761 , 1814/524
We exploit the tools of differential geometry to provide a clear explanation for the finite sample lack of invariance of the Wald statistic to algebraically equivalent reformulations of the null hypothesis. The Wald statistic is shown, in general, to be an improper geometric quantity and hence is not invariant to reparametrizations. The geometric approach also suggests an alternative invariant test based on the calculation of geodesic distances in curved manifolds. We show how this ``Fisher geodesic statistic'' may be easily calculated and applied in the case of testing nonlinear restrictions in the general linear model and also when it will coincide with the Wald statistic. We are also able to extend the familiar inequalities relating the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio statistics to the nonliner case with the fundamental difference that the Fisher geodesic takes the place previously occupied by the Wald statistic in the relevant inequality. The paper also provides an introduction to the methods of differential geometry (the relevant concepts are briefly summarized in the Appendix) and hopefully demonstrates its potential for econometricians.
reparametrizations, Wald statistic, testing nonlinear restrictions, invariant test, curved manifolds, general linear model, Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics, score statistics, finite sample lack of invariance, differential geometry, geodesic distances, Applications of statistics to economics, Fisher geodesic statistic, likelihood ratio statistics
reparametrizations, Wald statistic, testing nonlinear restrictions, invariant test, curved manifolds, general linear model, Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics, score statistics, finite sample lack of invariance, differential geometry, geodesic distances, Applications of statistics to economics, Fisher geodesic statistic, likelihood ratio statistics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
