
doi: 10.2307/2136126
pmid: 8777941
A prenatal care case-management program in Tennessee was evaluated to determine its effectiveness in improving the adequacy of prenatal care reducing the odds of preterm birth (gestation less than 37 weeks) and very low birth weight births (less than 1,500 g). The case-management program, Project HUG, included care provider referrals, visit scheduling, assistance with transportation and nutritional and health education. In a cohort of 66,051 Medicaid women with a birth during the period July 1989 through December 1991, 6% received HUG services. HUG participants had improved utilization of prenatal care, significantly decreased odds of inadequate perinatal care (an odds ratio of 0.71) and significantly increased odds of obtaining prenatal vitamins within 120 days of the last menstrual period (1.79). The apparent benefit of Project HUG was greater among blacks than among whites. However, there was no significant reduction in the incidence of preterm births or very low birth weight births among program participants
Black People, Health Services Accessibility, White People, Cohort Studies, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Fetal Growth Retardation, Medicaid, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Tennessee, United States, Black or African American, Treatment Outcome, Female, Case Management
Black People, Health Services Accessibility, White People, Cohort Studies, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Fetal Growth Retardation, Medicaid, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Tennessee, United States, Black or African American, Treatment Outcome, Female, Case Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
