
1. A nonstandard capacity construction, analogous to Loeb’s measure construction, is developed. Using this construction and Choquet’s Capacitability theorem, it is proved that a Loeb measurable function into a general (not necessarily second countable) space has a lifting precisely when its graph is ’almost’ analytic. This characterization is used to generalize and simplify some known lifting existence theorems. 2. The standard notion of ’Lusin measurability’ is related to the nonstandard notion of admitting a ’two-legged’ lifting. An immediate consequence is a new and simple proof of the general Lusin theorem. Another consequence is the existence of a Loeb measurable function, not admitting a lifting, into a relatively small topological space.
Loeb-measurability, Lifting theory, Nonstandard models in mathematics, Classes of sets (Borel fields, \(\sigma\)-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets, nonstandard capacity construction, Nonstandard measure theory, Lusin-measurability, precapacity, special saturated models of the universe, Measurable and nonmeasurable functions, sequences of measurable functions, modes of convergence, lifting
Loeb-measurability, Lifting theory, Nonstandard models in mathematics, Classes of sets (Borel fields, \(\sigma\)-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets, nonstandard capacity construction, Nonstandard measure theory, Lusin-measurability, precapacity, special saturated models of the universe, Measurable and nonmeasurable functions, sequences of measurable functions, modes of convergence, lifting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
