
tion errors of the difference method. Moreover, any error introduced in the nuinerical solution of y' 15 exp [15t] will be damped by exp [14t] in the substitution into (y, t) = y exp [-14t]. Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 give comparisons of relative errors in the numerical solution of x' 15et 14x obtained by direct integration, versus the solution obtained by using the alternate equationi. The method used is Adams-Bashforth 16th order predictor and Adams-Moulton 15th order corrector. The region of numerical stability (for one application of the corrector) is -.007 < h ? .011. The tables display results using step sizes that caused h to lie both inside (Table 1) and outside (Tables 2, 3, 4) of the stability region for the direct integration. All integrations connected with the solution using the altemate equation are within the stability region.
Numerical computation of solutions to single equations
Numerical computation of solutions to single equations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 240 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
