
doi: 10.2307/1940677
We investigated the role of ant behavior as a selective influence on the presentation and morphology of elaiosome—bearing seeds in Australian sclerophyll vegetation by manipulating characteristics of natural and artificial diaspores. We compared the response to these diaspores of three seed—removing ant species, two of which (Rhytidoponera "metallica" and Aphaenogaster longiceps), produce more favorable seed fates than the third species (Pheidole sp. 1). We measured the effect on removal rate of diaspore arrangement (degree of clumping), elaiosome removal, diaspore size (i.e., mass), elaiosome/load ratio, and composition of both the elaiosome and seed. Clumped seeds were removed significantly faster than single seeds by Pheidole sp. 1, a group forager. A. longiceps, a solitary forager, removed single seeds faster while R. "metallica" removed single and clumped seeds at the same rate. The presence of elaiosomes on seeds increased removal rates, especially by A. longiceps and R. "metallica." Both A. longiceps and R. "metallica" responded positively to elaiosome/load ratio while Pheidole sp. 1 responded mainly to diaspore size. These species—specific responses were such that diaspores with high elaiosome/seed ratios are more likely to be removed by A. longiceps or R. "metallica" than by Pheidole sp. 1. Diaspore characteristics other than size had inconsistent effects on removal rates. The differential response of the ant species to such characteristics as seed arrangement and elaiosome/seed ratios demonstrates the way in which ant behavior may have been an important selective force in the evolution and maintenance of myrmecochory.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 150 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
