Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecology
Article . 1964 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Edaphic Responses of Lupinus Texensis and Lupinus Subcarnosus

Authors: Elray S. Nixon;

Edaphic Responses of Lupinus Texensis and Lupinus Subcarnosus

Abstract

Lupinus texensis Hook, is widely distributed over a number of soils while L. subcarnosus Hook. is restricted to two sandy strips in south—central Texas. Transplants and seeds from certain soil types were grown on both indigenous (granitic sandy loam, limestone clay loam, Blackland Prairie silty clay loam, Bastrop Park sandy loam, and a South Strop sandy loam) and non—indigenous (serpentine sandy clay loam, Lufkin pinewoods sandy loam, and a Bastrop pinewoods sand) soils. Nutrients were added to certain soils, and plants of both species were grown in an inert perlite medium under various levels of calcium, nitrogen, and phosphorous. L. texensis transplants flowered and produced pods on all of the soil types, but the plants grown from seed varied with the soil. Specific edaphic selectivity of plants for their native soils was not detected. Growth was subnormal on serpentine and Lufkin pinewoods soils. L. subcarnosus transplants and plants grown from seed grew well on the Bastrop sand and sandy loam soils but showed inhibited growth on the limestone, Blackbird Prairie, serpentine, granitic, and Lufkin pinewoods soils. Plants grown on the limestone soil developed a lethal chlorosis. Vigor of both species on serpentine soil was increased by calcium and nitrogen treatments, and L. subcarnosus plants responded to nitrogen treatments when grown on the granitic soil. L. texensis and L. subcarnosus plants grown on the Lufkin pinewoods soil did not respond to nutrient treatments. Chelated iron additions corrected chlorotic effects induced by the limestone and Blackland Prairie soils but did not bring about normal growth. Maximum average production for both species occurred at about 50 ppm for calcium, about 105 ppm for nitrogen, and at 5—10 ppm for phosphorus. L. texensis apparently has a wide edaphic tolerance range with only the serpentine and Lufkin soils presenting barriers to its migration, while the distribution of L. subcarnosus appears to be primarily edaphically controlled by contiguous calcereous and east Texas pinewoods soils.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!