
doi: 10.2307/1933607
Hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii Ait.), a nitrogen—sensitive rain—forest species can be grown without fertilizers as an underplanting to established stands of Pinus, on soils which will not support open plantings of pure hoop pine without fertilizing with nitrogen at the rate of 112 kg/ha per year. Stem volume growth rates of 6.6 m3/ha per year representing 28% of total stand increment have been obtained in 15—year—old underplantings. Removal of the Pinuscomponent from mixed stands of Pinus and Araucaria led to chlorosis of the remaining hoop pine but no significant decline in foliar nitrogen levels nor loss in growth over the ensuing 3 years. In contrast, 2—year—old transplants of Araucaria established on a site from which mature Pinus had been clear felled exhibited extremely slow growth and chlorosis, which could be overcome either by shading or applying nitrogen fertilizers. Underplants responded only slightly to added nitrogen compared to open plantings. Nitrogen requirements of fertilized open plants and unfertilized underplants were similar, however, being approximately 0.005 g nitrogen/g dry matter produced. The rate of immobilization of nitrogen by 8—year—old underplants established at 1,160 trees/ha was only 3.4 kg/ha per year. The source of nitrogen for underplantings is discussed, and nitrogen requirements of hoop pine are considered in relation to light intensity. It is concluded that the success of underplanting is due to a multiplicity of factors,including (1) the role of nitrogen fixation in conjunction with Pinus and Araucaria; (2) the increased availability of nitrogen as a consequence of changes in the soil—nitrogen cycle; and (3) the effect of reduced light intensity on improving the carbohydrate/nitrogen balance in Araucaria under conditions of low soil—nitrogen availability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
