
doi: 10.2307/1554958
AbstractLinnaeus organised almost everything to which he put his mind and was the first to systematically apply a binomial system to all of nature. The philosophy underlying his system of nature is that of a ladder (pyramid) leading from stones, the lowest (furthest from Man), to animals, with Man, created in the image of God, being the highest. The classification functioned like a twodimensional map, characters of taxa being like latitude and longitude with a hierarchy of precision. It was of value in an age of discovery, although his classifications of stones and plants had short lives. The binomial system of naming, although not considered important by Linnaeus, was important in separating diagnoses/descriptions of taxa from the names of taxa. It is hoped that new philosophies will maintain the distinction between things named and their names.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
