Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Crustacea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Crustacean Biology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Development of Larvae of the Golden King Crab Lithodes Aequispinus (Anomura: Lithodidae) Reared at Different Temperatures

Authors: A. J. Paul; J. M. Paul;

Development of Larvae of the Golden King Crab Lithodes Aequispinus (Anomura: Lithodidae) Reared at Different Temperatures

Abstract

Unfed lecithotrophic larvae of the golden king crab Lithodes aequispinus were reared at 3, 6, and 9?C in darkness and 33-34 ppt salinity. This study was done to improve our understanding of larval development time and the ability of the larvae to survive under different seasonal thermal conditions. The survival rates and intermolt duration was observed for the first zoeal molt (ZI), second molt (ZII), third molt (ZIII), and glaucothoe (G). The duration from hatching to the start of the first nonlarval stage (crab I) averaged 148, 94, and 75 days at 3, 6, and 9?C, respectively. Development rate for ZI to Crab I versus the rearing temperature was described by the equation: Development period (days) = -35.82 (Rearing Temperature ?C) + 1.96 (0C2) + 238.6; r2 = 0.99. Regardless of stage, every degree increase in temperature reduced the length of the development period by approximately 9%. Survival rates of ZI larvae were typically >97% regardless of temperature. By the completion of the ZII molt 83-87% were still surviving. Survival rates to the end of the ZIII molt at 3? and 6?C were 77% and 75%, but only 65% at 9?C. Within stages there was no significant difference in survival rates for ZI, ZII, or ZIII at the 3 test temperatures. The survival rate through the glaucothoe stage was 47% and 51% for larvae reared at 3? and 6?C, respectively, while only 16% of those at 9?C survived to Crab I. There was no significant difference in the percentage of glaucothoe surviving at 3, 6, and 9?C. The golden king crab Lithodes aequispinus Benedict accounts for about 50% of all king crab landings in western Alaska (Otto, 1990) and because of its value there is interest in developing a sound biological basis for management (Shirley and Zhou, 1997; Adams and Paul, 1999). The larvae are large (ZI = 7 mm) nonfeeding organisms that in captivity exhibit both planktonic and benthic habits (Shirley and Zhou, 1997; Adams and Paul, 1999). Since juveniles are found geographically separated from adults, it has been hypothesized that the larvae are planktonic (Hiramoto, 1985; Sloan, 1985; Blau et al., 1996). Much of their habitat is in remote sites where temperatures of the water column are not monitored. In the bays of the North Pacific, juveniles live at 30 ZI were present. A total of 240 larvae were used in the study, 30 collected from each of the 8 females. The 30 larvae from each female were divided into 3 lots of 10 each. Each lot of 10 larvae was

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze