Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Notes on Elaphoglossum, III. The Publication of Elaphoglossum and Rhipidopteris

Authors: C. V. Morton;

Notes on Elaphoglossum, III. The Publication of Elaphoglossum and Rhipidopteris

Abstract

The two closely allied genera of ferns, Elaphoglossum and Rhipidopteris, one very large and the other very small, were included in the composite genus Acrostichum L. by early botanists. It is now generally agreed that they are not nearly related to the type species of Acrostichum, namely A. aureum L. The first botanist to suggest that they be separated was H. Schott. In his Genera Filicum, he proposed a segregate genus from Acrostichum which he called Bolbitis.l Following the description of this genus there is the following note: "Praeter Bolbitin alia duo genera: Elaphoglossum et Rhipidopteris, ab Acrostichis genuinis sunt segreganda. Prioris generis exempla sunt: E. simplex, conforme, apodum, viscosum, vestitum, etc. (Acrost. simplex, conforme etc. Auctorum); posterioris: Rh. Humboldtiana, peltata, foeniculacea et tripartita (Acrost. flabellatum, peltatum, etc., Auctorum.)" Christensen, in his Index Filicum, adopted these genera as validly published by Schott, but they cannot be so considered under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. There is not a word of description. Article 42 specifies that the name of a genus is not validly published unless it is accompanied either by a description of the genus or by the citation of a previously and

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!