Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Embryos of the Whale Shark, Rhincodon typus: Early Growth and Size Distribution

Authors: Wen-Been Chang; Ming-Yih Leu; Lee-Shing Fang;

Embryos of the Whale Shark, Rhincodon typus: Early Growth and Size Distribution

Abstract

1828, when a 13.7-m immature male was harpooned by fishermen off Table Bay, South Africa. Andrew Smith described the species as Rhincodon typus (Steel, 1985). However, small whale sharks were unknown until 1953, when a 355-mm embryo was taken in the Gulf of Mexico (Baughman, 1955; Reid 1957; Garrick, 1964). Fewer than 250 whale shark sightings have been recorded in the scientific literature, despite its becoming increasingly popular with the recreational diving community in areas where it commonly occurs. Of the 250 records, 122 provide an estimate of specimen length (i.e., 4-24 m), whereas 44 give actual measurments (Wolfson and Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1981). Before 1953, the smallest whale shark on record was 1.83 m (Howell-Rivero, 1936), based on an unseen description of a mounted skin. A 1.83-m specimen (presumably the same one) was cited by Bigelow and Schroeder (1948). If this questionable account is discounted, the smallest recorded size for a whale shark is 3.96

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!