
doi: 10.2307/1421441
that the retrieval process consisted of at least two major steps: (a) entering the appropriate category and (b) finding the appropriate member of that category. Suppose now that we ask a subject to name a member of a category, and some time later ask him to name a different member of that category. Will the speed with which he retrieves the second instance depend at all on his having retrieved the first instance? Several recent lines of investigation suggest that producing an instance of a category will facilitate later production of another instance of that category. In one such investigation, Collins and Quillian (1970) presented sentences such as 'A canary is a bird' and required subjects to decide whether the sentences were true or false. Prior exposure to one sentence reduced reaction time to a second sentence, sometimes by as much as 600 msec, whenever the same subject noun was used. For example, prior exposure to 'A canary is a bird' reduced reaction time to other sentences about canaries.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 110 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
