Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Who Stole Native American Studies?

Authors: Elizabeth Cook-Lynn;

Who Stole Native American Studies?

Abstract

ofordays in March 1970, American Indian scholars met at the First Convocation of American Indian Scholars at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, thousands of miles away from the homelands of the western Indians who dominated the meeting. This convocation brought together Native scholars, professional people, artists, and traditional historians and billed itself as the "first" convocation to proclaim that the academic intention of U.S. colleges and universities was to use education to affect the policy of this nation in Indian affairs. It called for the development by Indians of bodies of indigenous knowledge, and it called that development "Native American Studies as an Academic Discipline." Its major thrust was the defense of the land; and indigenous rights. Several of the speakers at this convocation said, "iwe cannot defend our languages and cultures if we cannot defend our homelands." 0 This milestone event set the agenda for strategy discussions that would bring about a change in the way Native life in America was stud3 ied. The main aim of these discussions was to assert that Indians were not just the inheritors of trauma but were also the heirs to vast legacies of knowledge about this continent and the universe that had been ignored in the larger picture of European invasion and education. Dr.; Alfonso Ortiz had just written and published in 1969 his classic work in anthropology, Being and Becoming in a Pueblo Society, and Dr. N. Scott Momaday, Kiowa, had just received the Pulitzer Prize for his novel

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    87
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
87
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!