
doi: 10.2307/1294972
In the December 1968 issue of BioScience, an article appeared entitled "Calculation and Miscalculation of the Allometric Equation as a Model in Biological Data" by Jerrold H. Zar. This article, while dealing with a very basic and important problem of data analysis-the question of whether or not to use data transformations in fitting models to biological data and the effect of these transformations-tends, I believe, to be misleading for the biological scientist. Since this journal is read primarily by reseachers in the biological sciences, it is important that some of the assertions in the referenced article be clarified. The discussion here falls into five categories: 1) Choice of model 2) Choice of estimation procedure 3) Comparison of models 4) Interpretation of the comparisons made in the referenced article 5) Some features of iterative least
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
