
doi: 10.2307/1229797
One result of the post-war disparity between agricultural and non-agricultural prices has been an emphasis on the fact that the economic welfare of any group in society depends upon the exchange value of its goods and services for the goods and services of other groups. This idea has been expressed in a variety of loose comments and rough comparisons. The three phrases, "the purchasing power of the farmer's dollar," "the purchasing power of the farmer's product," and "the purchasing power of the farmer, or the farmer's income," have been used interchangeably. Much publicity has been given to the first two of these phrases without recognizing that it is the third concept, namely, the purchasing power of the farmer, which is of greatest importance. This brief paper will attempt to deal only with the outstanding differences between these three forms of agricultural purchasing power and to indicate briefly the practical significance of the purchasing power of the farmer's income as a measure of agricultural welfare and as an element in the business activity of the country as a whole.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
