
doi: 10.2307/1179294
Perhaps the most perplexing problem that has troubled curriculum theorists is how to account for quality in human experience, for experience is an extraordinarily difficult thing to pin down and to theorize about. Experience seems to have both reflective and nonreflective dimensions and to consist of an ever fluctuating mixture of inseparable reactions sometimes roughly classified as cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. In short, "experience" seems to be a somewhat vague but all-embracing term that designates an amazingly wide and complex set of human phenomena comprising the most basic material of which all education consists. Thus we might expect to find curriculum theory attempting to develop some comprehensive conceptions about the nature of experience.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
