
doi: 10.2307/1163645
Leonard Rutman (1980) has recently written a book entitled Planning Useful Evaluations: Evaluability Assessment, in which he outlines procedures for determining whether or not a program can be effectively evaluated. In 1976, my colleagues and I conducted a preevaluation assessment as part of the planning for a large educational evaluation (Smith, Erpelding, & Owen, Note 1). Although at the time we had not heard of the term "evaluability assessment," the procedures we employed followed Rutman's recommendations with great fidelity. It seems useful, therefore, to review Rutman's recommendations on the basis of our experience with similar procedures. What follows is a brief discussion of Rutman's view of evaluability assessment, a short description of our evaluation planning activities, and a retrospective critique of Rutman's evaluability model.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
