
doi: 10.2307/1129500
pmid: 7318517
A multiple habituation paradigm was used to determine whether 10--12-month-old infants were able to discriminate between visual arrays which differed only in their numerosity (2 vs. 3, 3, vs. 4, or 4 vs. 5 items). 96 infants were tested in one of two conditions. In the heterogeneous condition, infants were habituated to a series of slides in which only the number of items remained invariant, while the item type (e.g., dogs, houses, etc.), size, and position varied on each slide. In the homogeneous condition, both the item type (chicks) and number remained invariant, while the size and position of the stimuli varied. Infants in both conditions were then tested with slides which contained either N + 1 or N - 1 items. The results demonstrated that, regardless of condition (homogeneous/heterogeneous), infants were able to discriminate between 2 and 3 items and unable to discriminate between 4 and 5 items. For the 3 versus 4 discrimination, a condition x sex interaction indicated that females discriminated between the items in the homogeneous condition while males were able to make the discrimination in the heterogeneous condition. Since the subjects in this study were preverbal infants, the results suggest that early counting skills are preceded by a more perceptual awareness of numerosity.
Male, Concept Formation, Infant, Psychology, Child, Discrimination Learning, Form Perception, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Humans, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Size Perception
Male, Concept Formation, Infant, Psychology, Child, Discrimination Learning, Form Perception, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Humans, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Size Perception
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 252 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
