Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Relativism, Self-Centering, and Conceptual Level

Authors: N H, WEINBERG;

Relativism, Self-Centering, and Conceptual Level

Abstract

Piaget has described a phase of development in middle childhood which he termed "egocentric." At this time (age 6 to 8) the child takes his own point of view as absolute and is unable to assume the point of view of others. In his investigations Piaget employed a series of questions to determine whether the child had a relativistic, as opposed to egocentric, view of the concepts "brother" and "left-right" (6, p. 98). These questions have been used by subsequent investigators (4, 7) to derive a relativism scale which was used as a measure of egocentric thinking. Although Piaget assumes that egocentricity is a relatively general stage through which all children pass and which only gradually yields to a more socialized position, he has not concerned himself with the testing of this generality either between various cognitive functions or within particular individuals. Some evidence of this generality already exists. Numerous studies of conceptual development show that the 7to 8-year range is an important one. For example, concrete groupings on the Goldstein ObjectSorting Test are giving way to functional sortings, and abstractions are beginning to appear (8). On the Weigl Color-Form Sorting Test, this is the period when 50 per cent or more of the children can abstract and sort by both form and color (8). At about this time also, Rorschach responses rise to a plateau of differentiation and integration which lasts until the child is 1o (3). But in all these studies the degree to which egocentricity was characteristic of a particular child on a variety of conceptual tasks was not explored. One purpose of the present study was to determine whether children's performance on the relativism scale (RS) was positively correlated with the egocentricity of their performance on other measures of conceptual function.

Keywords

Concept Formation, Humans, Personality Disorders, Defense Mechanisms, Personality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!