
pmid: 2660533
In a blinded retrospective study of the efficacy of sonography of the salivary glands, we obtained sonograms on 849 patients. The patients were referred over the last 5 years from the ear, nose, and throat department of our university hospital. Eight-eight percent of the patients had symptoms related to the salivary glands. One hundred fifty-six of the patients (18%) were subsequently proved to be normal. The remaining 693 patients had diseases confirmed by histologic examination (332 patients), sialography (274 patients), or clinical follow-up (87 patients). Of these, 289 had salivary gland tumors (231 benign, 58 malignant), 185 had calculi, 154 had inflammation, 48 had autoimmune disease, 14 had cysts, and three had trauma. Two hundred eighty-seven (95%) of the 302 space-occupying lesions could be completely delineated by sonography, and the benign or malignant nature of the lesions was correctly assessed in 272 (90%). Of the 185 patients with calculi, the calculi were visualized and localized (intraductal vs intraglandular) on the sonograms in 174 (94%) patients. Abscesses were shown on the sonograms in 13 patients, and acute inflammation was shown on the sonograms in 84 patients. These results indicate that sonography is a useful procedure for diagnosis of diseases of the salivary glands.
Calcinosis, Humans, Salivary Gland Diseases, Salivary Gland Neoplasms, False Negative Reactions, Sialadenitis, Autoimmune Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
Calcinosis, Humans, Salivary Gland Diseases, Salivary Gland Neoplasms, False Negative Reactions, Sialadenitis, Autoimmune Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 187 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
