Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Patterns of nectar robbing on two manzanita species

Authors: Dyste, Breana; Avrodet Mourkus; Ruiz, Kenny; Vargas, Benjamin;

Patterns of nectar robbing on two manzanita species

Abstract

Pollinators provide ecosystem services and facilitate plant reproduction. Plant-pollinator interactions often benefit both partners and are considered mutualisms. However, cheating can occur in these interactions when floral visitors take resources from plants without providing any benefit (Smithson 2013). One example of this kind of cheating is nectar robbing, which occurs when a pollinator collects nectar from a hole in the flower’s corolla and bypasses pollination. We compared the variation of floral nectar robbing between two species of manzanita, Arctostaphylos viscida (whiteleaf manzanita) and A. manzanita (common manzanita). We examined both buds and blooms to explore the relationship between age on the robbing behavior of floral visitors. We found no difference in the percent of nectar robbing between whiteleaf and common manzanita. There was no notable difference of nectar robbing between blooms and buds in common manzanita, however, there was nearly three times more nectar robbing on blooms than buds in whiteleaf manzanita. Studying nectar robbing behavior, as well as its impact on flowering plants, can help monitor successful and unsuccessful pollination.

CEC Research Volume 5, Issue 1

Keywords

mutualism, phenophase, nectar robbing, common manzanita, whiteleaf manzanita

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!