
doi: 10.2190/ns.18.2.c
pmid: 18511390
As radical health professionals, we have the triple identity of workers, of activists, and of intellectuals that creates the cauldron in which we live contradictory lives. We share the concerns of other workers for salaries, job security, health and safety at work, and work load. But like teachers and unlike most other workers we are not completely alienated from our work and have a stake in the outcomes of our labors that we are not always free to express or act on. As professionals, we share with our colleagues the intellectual curiosity about the origins of new infectious diseases, how racism exhausts the adrenals, or the egg-laying behavior of mosquitoes in polluted environments but may be in conflict with them around the need for universal free health care, or distorted priority given to molecular approaches to disease. We are partisans in institutions that feign neutrality. As activists, we are unwilling to accept the boundaries of “professionalism” and both learn from and offer our understanding to our communities of struggle. These three moments of our lives sometimes conflict but are also mutually enriching. There is no single formula for navigating this turbulent habitat but there is an array of options for avoiding burn-out and enjoying a life that is politically productive, intellectually challenging, and with lovely people.
Health Policy, Bias, Epidemiologic Research Design, Public Health Practice, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Public Health, Public Health Administration
Health Policy, Bias, Epidemiologic Research Design, Public Health Practice, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Public Health, Public Health Administration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
