
doi: 10.2172/828579 , 10.2172/828581
The Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS) is responsible for the safe storage, processing and immobilization of the High Level (radioactive) Waste (HLW) currently stored in approximately fifty million-gallon underground storage tanks. Foam is present in many areas of the HLW processing including HLW chemical processing, HLW evaporation and HLW cesium decontamination. Foam impacts the production rates of each of these facilities. The presence of foam during chemical processing and evaporation steps leads to slower production rates in the high level waste evaporators and in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) waste pretreatment and may lead to higher capital costs or slower production in cesium decontamination. Also, excessive foam causes radioactive contamination of the condensate and equipment. Hence, the objective of this research is to study the mechanisms that produce foaming during nuclear waste treatment, to identify key parameters which aggravate foaming, and to identify effective ways to eliminate or mitigate foaming.
Mitigation, Phase Studies, Evaporation, 610, 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes, Storage, Cesium, Processing, Contamination, Waste Processing, Colloids, Particle Size, Radioactive Wastes, Wastes, 54 Environmental Sciences, Radioactive Waste Processing, Decontamination, And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities, Underground Storage, Production, 621, Foams, 620, Capitalized Cost, Condensates, Tanks, Concentration Ratio, Evaporators
Mitigation, Phase Studies, Evaporation, 610, 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes, Storage, Cesium, Processing, Contamination, Waste Processing, Colloids, Particle Size, Radioactive Wastes, Wastes, 54 Environmental Sciences, Radioactive Waste Processing, Decontamination, And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities, Underground Storage, Production, 621, Foams, 620, Capitalized Cost, Condensates, Tanks, Concentration Ratio, Evaporators
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
