
doi: 10.2172/801170 , 10.2172/11274 , 10.2172/803064 , 10.2172/808214
DOE has authorized in their letter of August 2, 1999, the operation of these three furnaces, quote ''Operation of the three uncompleted muffle furnaces (No.3, No.4, and No.5) located in Room 235B is authorized, using the same feed charge limits as the two existing furnaces (No.1, and No.2) located in Room 230C,''. The above statement incorrectly refers to Room 230C whereas the correct location is Room 230A. The current effort is directed to initiate the operation and to complete the design activities DOE authorized the operation of the furnaces based on their Safety Evaluation Report (SER). Based on analogy and the principle of similarity, the risks and consequences of accidents both onsite and offsite due to operation of three furnaces are not significantly larger than those already evaluated with the two operating furnaces. Thermal stabilization operations and the material of feed for furnaces in Glovebox HA-21 I are essentially the same as those currently being stabilized in furnaces in Glovebox HC-21 C. Therefore the accident analysis has utilized identical accident scenarios in evaluation and no additional failure modes are introduced by HA-21 I muffle furnace operation that would enhance the consequences of accidents. Authorization Basis documents as referenced below (PFP FSAR and DOE Letter authorizing the operation) appear to contradict each other, i.e. one allows and authorizes the operation and the other imposes the restriction on the operation. The purpose of the PFP FSAR restrictions was to review thoroughly the design and installation of three furnaces and perform acceptance testing before approving the startup for operation. With the experience of operating the two furnaces in Glovebox HC-21C, and the knowledge of risks and hazards the facility operation, the plant is adequately prepared to operate these additional furnaces. ECN 653595 has been prepared to incorporate operation of the muffle furnaces in Glovebox HA-21 I into the PFP FSAR.
Radiation Accidents, And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities, Design, Maintenance, Gloveboxes, Furnaces, Radioactive Waste Storage, Performance Testing, Equipment, 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes, Documentation, Residues, Recommendations, 11 Nuclear Fuel Cycle And Fuel Materials, Stabilization, Plutonium, Materials Handling Equipment, Safety Analysis, Safety Engineering, Fuel Reprocessing Plants, Plutonium Oxides, Radioactive Waste Facilities, Operation
Radiation Accidents, And Non-Radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities, Design, Maintenance, Gloveboxes, Furnaces, Radioactive Waste Storage, Performance Testing, Equipment, 12 Management Of Radioactive Wastes, Documentation, Residues, Recommendations, 11 Nuclear Fuel Cycle And Fuel Materials, Stabilization, Plutonium, Materials Handling Equipment, Safety Analysis, Safety Engineering, Fuel Reprocessing Plants, Plutonium Oxides, Radioactive Waste Facilities, Operation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
