
doi: 10.2172/1027944
The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been at the forefront of developing methods to reduce the cost and schedule of deactivating spent fuel pools (SFP). Several pools have been deactivated at the INL using an underwater approach with divers. These projects provided a basis for the INL cooperation with the Dresden Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 SFP (Exelon Generation Company) deactivation. It represents the first time that a commercial nuclear power plant (NPP) SFP was decommissioned using this underwater coating process. This approach has advantages in many aspects, particularly in reducing airborne contamination and allowing safer, more cost effective deactivation. The INL pioneered underwater coating process was used to decommission three SFPs with a total combined pool volume of over 900,000 gallons. INL provided engineering support and shared project plans to successfully initiate the Dresden project. This report outlines the steps taken by INL and Exelon to decommission SFPs using the underwater coating process. The rationale used to select the underwater coating process and the advantages and disadvantages are described. Special circumstances are also discussed, such as the use of a remotely-operated underwater vehicle to visually and radiologically map the pool areas that were not readily accessible. A larger project, the INTEC-603 SFP in-situ (grouting) deactivation, is reviewed. Several specific areas where special equipment was employed are discussed and a Lessons Learned evaluation is included.
Radiochemistry, Schedules, Deactivation, Submarines Spent Fuel Pool, 21 Specific Nuclear Reactors And Associated Plants, 11 Nuclear Fuel Cycle And Fuel Materials, Spent Fuel Pool, 38 Radiation Chemistry, Contamination, Grouting, Coatings, Nuclear Power Plants, Ineel, Evaluation, And Nuclear Chemistry, Spent Fuels, Decommissioning
Radiochemistry, Schedules, Deactivation, Submarines Spent Fuel Pool, 21 Specific Nuclear Reactors And Associated Plants, 11 Nuclear Fuel Cycle And Fuel Materials, Spent Fuel Pool, 38 Radiation Chemistry, Contamination, Grouting, Coatings, Nuclear Power Plants, Ineel, Evaluation, And Nuclear Chemistry, Spent Fuels, Decommissioning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
