
doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.256
pmid: 16784210
The potential of a mesophilic–thermophilic–mesophilic anaerobic digestion system was investigated with respect to improvement of both digestion and sanitation efficiencies during treatment of liquid cattle manure. The pilot plant produced a high methane yield from liquid dairy cattle manure of 0.24 m3 (kg VSfed)−1. Considering the low system loading rate of 1.4–1.5 kg VS (m3 d)−1, digestion efficiency compared to conventional processes did not appear improved. The minimum guaranteed retention time in the tubular thermophilic reactor was increased compared to a continuously stirred tank reactor. Levels of intestinal enterococci in raw liquid manure as determined with cultivation methods were reduced by 2.5–3 log units to a level of around 102 cfu/mL. This sanitizing effect was achieved both during mesophilic–thermophilic–mesophilic and thermophilic–mesophilic treatment, provided the thermophilic digester was operated at 53–55°C. A change in feeding interval from 1 h to 4 h did not significantly alter methane yield and sanitation efficiency. It was proposed that a two-stage, thermophilic–mesophilic anaerobic digestion system would be able to achieve the same sanitizing effect and equal or better digestion efficiency at lower costs.
Waste Disposal, Fluid, Manure, Bacteria, Anaerobic, Kinetics, Biodegradation, Environmental, Enterobacteriaceae, Animals, Cattle, Sanitary Engineering, Methane
Waste Disposal, Fluid, Manure, Bacteria, Anaerobic, Kinetics, Biodegradation, Environmental, Enterobacteriaceae, Animals, Cattle, Sanitary Engineering, Methane
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
