Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Toprak Su Dergisiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Toprak Su Dergisi
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Toprak Su Dergisi
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Eskişehir ve Sakarya İlleri'nde Kurulu Bazı Damla Sulama Sistemlerinde Performans Göstergelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Damla sulama sistemlerinde performans göstergeleri

Authors: Demet UYGAN; Öner ÇETİN;

Eskişehir ve Sakarya İlleri'nde Kurulu Bazı Damla Sulama Sistemlerinde Performans Göstergelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Damla sulama sistemlerinde performans göstergeleri

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate drip irrigation systems of 13 different farms in Eskisehir and Adapazari regions from 2007 through 2009. Emission uniformity (EU): 80-99%; actual efficiency of low quarter application (AELQ): 74-95%; potential efficiency of low quarter (PELQ): 66-86%; system application efficiency (Ea): 56-96%; pressure differences (P): 22-75% and dripper discharge differences (q): 3-49% was determined. The significant problems on water application of drip irrigation systems tested in the study area have appeared. The differences on dripper discharges and pressures for the tested systems were not acceptable values. Thus, the lower these performances might be attributed to clogging and/or lack of system design and application practices. There was, because, no media filter in the most of the drip irrigation systems tested. It was observed that the systems were constructed and used without considering soil and crop characteristics including manifolds, drip-lines (lateral), dripper discharge, pump and other units. In addition, the farmers have no appropriate knowledge on drip irrigation systems and its operation. It is strongly recommended that the farmers used drip irrigation systems must get appropriate training.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold