Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Clinical Ophthalmolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Clinical Ophthalmology
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Clinical Ophthalmology
Article . 2023
Data sources: DOAJ
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Dove Medical Press
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Dove Medical Press
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Vector Analysis and Prognostic Factors for Femtosecond Arcuate Keratotomy in Post-Keratoplasty Astigmatism

Authors: Bayan A Alsaif; Abdulaziz Al Somali; Sumayah H Banaji; Askar K Alshaibani;

Vector Analysis and Prognostic Factors for Femtosecond Arcuate Keratotomy in Post-Keratoplasty Astigmatism

Abstract

To analyze different tomographic and refractive parameters for predicting successful visual outcome following femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) for post-keratoplasty astigmatism.Retrospective.Retrospective study evaluating patients with astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) who underwent FSAK. Vector analysis using the Alpins method was done to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). An improvement of 3 lines of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) lines was used for successful outcome. Outcome was measured at 3 months and 17 months.This study included 106 eyes from 104 patients (65 males and 39 females). Mean age was 31.8±8.6 years, and 89.4% (n=93) of cases were keratoconus (KC), 3.8% (n=4) scar, 3.8% (n=4) granular dystrophy, 1.9% (n=2) post-LASIK ectasia, and 1.0% (n=1) macular dystrophy. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) improved from 1.02±0.53 logarithm minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.87±0.49 logMAR (p=0.01) at 3 months and to 0.92±1.08 logMAR (p=0.57) at 17 months. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) improved from 0.41±0.30 logMAR to 0.31±0.19 logMAR (p<0.01) at 3 months and to 0.23±0.27 logMAR (p<0.01) at 17 months. Success was achieved in 50% (n=53) and 49% (n=52) at 3 and 17 months follow-up, respectively. Success group showed worse preoperative UCVA (1.21±0.56 vs 0.83±0.44 logMAR; p<0.01), worse preoperative BSCVA (0.50±0.36 vs 0.33±0.19 logMAR; p=0.01). Preoperative UCVA had an area under the curve of 0.721 (95% CI: 0.622-0.820; p< 0.01). The Youden's optimal cutoff point was 0.90 logMAR (equivalent Snellen 20/159) with 76.9% sensitivity and 35.2% specificity. Flattening index (FI) was 87% in DALK and 73% in PKP (p=0.14). Correction index (CI) was 99% and 86% (p=0.18) for DALK and PKP, respectively. Success of the astigmatic surgery for DALK and PKP was 44% vs 42% (p=0.29), respectively.Improvement of at least three lines was achieved in 49% of patients who underwent FSAK following PKP or DALK; this improvement was achieved in patients who had a worse preoperative UCVA.

Keywords

femtosecond arcuate keratotomy, dalk, astigmatic keratotomy, Clinical Ophthalmology, pkp, RE1-994, Ophthalmology, vector analysis., keratoplasty astigmatism, Original Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold