
Summary One of the crucial problems of a psychology of religion is: how to do justice to the specific character of a concrete religion, at the same time maintaining scientific neutrality. Moving outside the context of a concrete specific religion, psychology is in danger of getting entangled in too general speculations about vague phenomena, of which the religious coefficient remains undeterminate; operating within the intention of a religion, it might abdicate its objectivity. With respect to religious experience, the problem narrows down to the question, how a psychology of religion might take into due consideration the transcendent reality, which occupies such a central position within certain varieties of religion, as for instance in the case of Christianity. If religious experience might have the character of a transcending process, how could this process be described and interpreted in psychological terms? There is an additional aggravating complication, however, at the moment “transcendence” has to...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
