
handle: 20.500.11850/20804
AbstractThe use of generalized linear models (GLM) to estimate claims reserves has become a standard method in insurance. Most frequently, the exponential dispersion family (EDF) is used; see e.g. England, Verrall. We study the so-called Tweedie EDF and test the sensitivity of the claims reserves and their mean square error of predictions (MSEP) over this family. Furthermore, we develop second order Taylor approximations for the claims reserves and the MSEPs for members of the Tweedie family that are difficult to obtain in practice, but are close enough to models for which claims reserves and MSEP estimations are easy to determine. As a result of multiple case studies, we find that claims reserves estimation is relatively insensitive to which distribution is chosen amongst the Tweedie family, in contrast to the MSEP, which varies widely.
Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics, claims reserving, prediction error, power variance function, claims reserving; exponential dispersion family; model uncertainty; power variance function; tweedie's exponential dispersion models; prediction error, Tweedie's exponential dispersion models, tweedie's exponential dispersion models, exponential dispersion family, Risk theory, insurance, model uncertainty
Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics, claims reserving, prediction error, power variance function, claims reserving; exponential dispersion family; model uncertainty; power variance function; tweedie's exponential dispersion models; prediction error, Tweedie's exponential dispersion models, tweedie's exponential dispersion models, exponential dispersion family, Risk theory, insurance, model uncertainty
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
