Bonus-Malus Systems: “Lack of Transparency” and Adequacy Measure

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Nov 2002 Italy English Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:ASTIN Bulletin, volume 32, pages 315-318 (issn: 0515-0361, eissn: 1783-1350,

Copyright policy )

Authors: VERICO, Paola;

doi: 10.2143/ast.32.2.1032

handle: 11573/17569

Bonus-Malus Systems: “Lack of Transparency” and Adequacy Measure

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

AbstractBased on a recent contribution by Baione and others in this Journal, some consequences of the decrease of the mean merit coefficient for portfolios of Bonus-Malus policies, and some alternative ways to measure the “quality” of a Bonus-Malus system are discussed.

Country

Italy

Related Organizations

Sapienza University of Rome
Italy

Keywords

Risk theory, insurance, Finance etc.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	4
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average