<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The teacher–student relationship is modeled as an agency problem, where teachers are concerned with human capital formation and students with ability signaling. We distinguish between two cases depending on whether in ability inference the job market can or cannot observe the grading rule applied. We show that many empirical grading patterns, including grade compression and inflation, are all consistent with optimal ability screening when grading rules are unobservable. With observable grading rules, the teacher perfectly screens students' abilities, provided that certain conditions hold. We apply the model to discuss policy applications such as “No Child Left Behind.”
2002 Economics and Econometrics, 330 Economics, Principal-agent model, teacher-student relationship, costless rewards, grading rules, mismatch of abilities and grades, grade inflation, teacher incentives, 10007 Department of Economics, IEW Institute for Empirical Research in Economics (former), Mechanism design, non-pecuniary incentives, op- timal grading schemes, mismatch of grades and abilities, com- pression of ratings, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D86, jel: jel:J41, jel: jel:I20
2002 Economics and Econometrics, 330 Economics, Principal-agent model, teacher-student relationship, costless rewards, grading rules, mismatch of abilities and grades, grade inflation, teacher incentives, 10007 Department of Economics, IEW Institute for Empirical Research in Economics (former), Mechanism design, non-pecuniary incentives, op- timal grading schemes, mismatch of grades and abilities, com- pression of ratings, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D86, jel: jel:J41, jel: jel:I20
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |