
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.847664
handle: 10230/932
The generalization of simple (two-variable) correspondence analysis to more than two categorical variables, commonly referred to as multiple correspondence analysis, is neither obvious nor well-defined. We present two alternative ways of generalizing correspondence analysis, one based on the quantification of the variables and intercorrelation relationships, and the other based on the geometric ideas of simple correspondence analysis. We propose a version of multiple correspondence analysis, with adjusted principal inertias, as the method of choice for the geometric definition, since it contains simple correspondence analysis as an exact special case, which is not the situation of the standard generalizations. We also clarify the issue of supplementary point representation and the properties of joint correspondence analysis, a method that visualizes all two-way relationships between the variables. The methodology is illustrated using data on attitudes to science from the International Social Survey Program on Environment in 1993.
eigendecomposition, questionnaire data, singular value decomposition, Correspondence analysis, eigendecomposition, joint correspondence analysis, multivariate categorical data, questionnaire data, singular value decomposition, correspondence analysis, Statistics, Econometrics and Quantitative Methods, multivariate categorical data, joint correspondence analysis, jel: jel:C88, jel: jel:C19
eigendecomposition, questionnaire data, singular value decomposition, Correspondence analysis, eigendecomposition, joint correspondence analysis, multivariate categorical data, questionnaire data, singular value decomposition, correspondence analysis, Statistics, Econometrics and Quantitative Methods, multivariate categorical data, joint correspondence analysis, jel: jel:C88, jel: jel:C19
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
