
We identify the optimal contract between a rating agency and a firm and the circumstances under which simple ownership contracts implement this optimal solution. We assume that the decision to obtain a rating is endogenous and the price of a rating is a strategic variable. Clients hiding their ratings can be an equilibrium only if they are ex ante uncertain of their quality and if the hiring decision is not observable. For some distribution functions, a competitive rating market is necessary for this result to obtain. In this context, competition between rating intermediaries will lead to less information in equilibrium.
certification; corporate governance, Ownership, [SHS.ECO.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance/domain_shs.eco.eco, Certification; Corporate governance., ratings, jel: jel:L15, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D23, jel: jel:G34
certification; corporate governance, Ownership, [SHS.ECO.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance/domain_shs.eco.eco, Certification; Corporate governance., ratings, jel: jel:L15, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D23, jel: jel:G34
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
