
handle: 10419/33268 , 10419/18583 , 1885/34842
In this paper, a decomposition method for Tobit-models is derived, which allows the differences in observed outcome variables between two groups to be decomposed into a part that is explained by differences in observed characteristics and a part attributable to differences in the estimated coefficients. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that in the case of censored dependent variables this decomposition method produces more reliable results than the conventional Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. Finally, our method is applied to a decomposition of the gender wage gap using German data.
Economics, Keywords: decomposition analysis, 2002 Cultural Studies, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, Tobit model, wage gap, Social Sciences & Humanities, J31, Labor Market Research, wage gap, Economic Statistics, Econometrics, Business Informatics, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition,Tobit model,wage gap, ddc:330, Arbeitsmarktforschung, Wirtschaft, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition; Tobit model; wage gap, Wirtschaftsstatistik, Ökonometrie, Wirtschaftsinformatik, Monte Carlo analysis, C24, gender disparity, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, Tobit model, numerical model, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition; Tobit model; gender wage gap, jel: jel:C24, jel: jel:J31, ddc: ddc:330
Economics, Keywords: decomposition analysis, 2002 Cultural Studies, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, Tobit model, wage gap, Social Sciences & Humanities, J31, Labor Market Research, wage gap, Economic Statistics, Econometrics, Business Informatics, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition,Tobit model,wage gap, ddc:330, Arbeitsmarktforschung, Wirtschaft, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition; Tobit model; wage gap, Wirtschaftsstatistik, Ökonometrie, Wirtschaftsinformatik, Monte Carlo analysis, C24, gender disparity, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, Tobit model, numerical model, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition; Tobit model; gender wage gap, jel: jel:C24, jel: jel:J31, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
