Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Achievement goals in L2 writing: Measurement and effects on task performance

Authors: Enhao Feng; Chengchen Li;

Achievement goals in L2 writing: Measurement and effects on task performance

Abstract

Achievement goals (AGs) are pivotal in L2 writing, but they are yet to be systematically conceptualized at the task-specific level, and their impact on writing task performance remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study conceptualized task-specific AGs, validated a measurement instrument, and examined their effects on task performance. A total of 629 Chinese undergraduate EFL learners completed argumentative writing tasks and a composite questionnaire. Exploratory structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor structure of the Scale for Task-Specific Achievement Goals in L2 Writing: mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance. The scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties (reliability, convergent, discriminant, criterion validity, and cross-gender measurement invariance). Structural equation modeling revealed that mastery-avoidance goals significantly predicted self-rated task response and performance-approach goals significantly predicted self-rated lexical resource, two dimensions of writing task performance; however, no AGs significantly predicted actual writing task performance. We argue that a certain threshold of L2 proficiency may be a prerequisite for AGs to translate into actual writing task performance. Teachers are advised to encourage adaptive AGs while simultaneously building L2 proficiency to bridge the gap between AGs and writing task performance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!