
In the early 20th century, collegiate home economics programs in the U.S. served as a gateway to science for American women. Using a collection of historical course catalogs, we first document that these programs featured a curriculum heavily emphasizing science courses, particularly in biology and chemistry. We then estimate that a 10 percentage point increase in the share of women in home economics led to a 1.8-3.1 percentage point increase in the share of women majoring in science, using rich cross sectional data from the 1910 Commissioner of Education report and panel data from historical college yearbooks. We argue this correlation is likely causal and provide evidence consistent with the corre- lation being driven by exposure to scientific content in the home economics curriculum. Furthermore, we show that these historical curriculum decisions have a persistent effect, continuing to shape the modern-day gender gap in STEM.
Economic History, Gender gap in STEM, Higher education, Home Economics
Economic History, Gender gap in STEM, Higher education, Home Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
