
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6101506
This essay is an act of ontological gardening. It begins with a simple task: to distinguish between two terms often used interchangeably-concept and conception. What unfolds is not a dry taxonomy, but a revelation of the very dynamics of thought itself. Through metaphors of the seed, Leibniz's monad, and the cellular automaton, the text shows that a concept is a minimal, generative unit-an atomic seed of potential-while a conception is the emergent universe grown from it: a structured, dynamic system where concepts interact, conflict, and co-evolve. This distinction is not merely academic; it is a practical toolkit for philosophy, cognitive science, systems design, and human-AI collaboration.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
