
<div> We propose a methodology to test for the null hypothesis that the alphas of a panel of asset returns are jointly equal to zero in a linear factor pricing model with observable and tradable factors - that is, the <span>null of zero alpha. The test is based on equation-by-equation estimation, using a randomized version of the estimated alphas, which only requires rates of convergence. The distinct features of the proposed methodology are that it does not require the estimation of any covariance matrix, and that it allows for both N and T to pass to infinity, with the former possibly faster than the latter. Further, unlike extant approaches, the procedure can accommodate conditional heteroskedasticity, non-Gaussianity, and strong cross-sectional dependence in the error terms. We also propose a derandomized decision rule to choose in favor or against the correct specification of a linear factor pricing model. Monte Carlo simulations show that the test has satisfactory properties and it compares favorably </span><span>to several existing tests. The usefulness of the testing procedure is illustrated through an application of linear factor pricing models to the constituents of the S&P 500.</span> </div>
Kapitalmarktrendite, Statistischer Test, ddc:330, Econometrics (econ.EM), FOS: Economics and business, stock index, statistical error, statistical test, Panel, Statistischer Fehler, Capital market return, Econometrics, Aktienindex, panel, USA, Theorie
Kapitalmarktrendite, Statistischer Test, ddc:330, Econometrics (econ.EM), FOS: Economics and business, stock index, statistical error, statistical test, Panel, Statistischer Fehler, Capital market return, Econometrics, Aktienindex, panel, USA, Theorie
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
