
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.499441
There is a great deal of debate in finance literature as to whether Capital Asset Pricing Model is empirically valid, and in particular whether beta can be properly measured. This paper proves that from a theoretical perspective CAPM leads to mathematical contradictions. In other words, CAPM is theoretically invalid, and beta is dead!
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
