
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.467243
handle: 2078.1/4925 , 10419/118126
This paper reinterprets by y-core (Chander and Tulkens (1995, 1997)) and justifies it as well as its prediction that the efficient coalition structure is stable in terms of the coalition formation theory. It is assumed that coalitions can freely merge or break apart, are farsighted (that is, it is the final and not the immediate payoffs that matter to the coalitions) and a coalition may deviate if and only if it stands to gain from it. It is then shown that subsequent to a deviation by a coalition, the nonmembers will have incentives to break apart into singletons, as is assumed in the definition of the y-characteristic function, and that the grand coalition is the only stable coalition structure.
Coalition formation, Spieltheorie, ddc:330, Characteristic function, Koalition, Strategic games, C71, C72, D62, Core, Theorie
Coalition formation, Spieltheorie, ddc:330, Characteristic function, Koalition, Strategic games, C71, C72, D62, Core, Theorie
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
