
handle: 10256/26378 , 10630/40288
Abstract We introduce a novel principle that we call weak pairwise justifiability, which applies to a large class of collective choice rules, including the social choice functions and the social welfare functions about which the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem and Arrow’s impossibility theorem are predicated, respectively. We prove that, under appropriate qualifications, our principle is a common root for these two classical results, when applied to rules defined over the full domain of weak preference orders (also for strict).
Pairwise justifiability, Social choice functions, Strategy, Multiple criteria decision making, Arrow's theorem, Choice, Gibbard-Satterthwaite, Teoria de, Arrow, Paradoxa de, Gibbard-Satterthwaite theory, Arrow paradox, Decisió multicriteri, Gibbard-Satterthwaite's theorem, Elección social, Toma de decisiones
Pairwise justifiability, Social choice functions, Strategy, Multiple criteria decision making, Arrow's theorem, Choice, Gibbard-Satterthwaite, Teoria de, Arrow, Paradoxa de, Gibbard-Satterthwaite theory, Arrow paradox, Decisió multicriteri, Gibbard-Satterthwaite's theorem, Elección social, Toma de decisiones
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
