
pmid: 37060888
The matrix pencil method (MPM) is tested as an approach to quantitatively process multiexponential low-field nuclear magnetic resonance T1 relaxometry data. The data is obtained by measuring T1 saturation recovery curves in the highly inhomogeneous magnetic field of a stray-field sensor. 0.9% brine solutions, doped with different concentrations of a Gd3+ containing contrast agent, serve as test liquids. Relaxation-times as a function of contrast-agent concentration along with the T1 relaxation curves for combinations of multiple different test liquids are measured, and the results from processing using MPM as well as inverse Laplace transformation as a benchmark are compared. The relaxation-time resolution limits of both procedures are probed by gradually reducing the difference between the relaxation-times of two liquids measured simultaneously. The sensitivity to quantify the relative contribution of each component to the magnetization build-up curve is explored by changing their volume ratio. Furthermore, the potential to resolve systems with more than two components is tested. For the systems under test, MPM shows superior performance in separating two or three relaxation components, respectively and effectively quantifying the time constants.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
