
pmid: 36027706
The determination of amino acids in food and feed by chromatography has a long history and is described in several official methods, including standards from ISO, AOAC, and the European Commission (EC) regulation 152/2009. The procedure usually consists of labor- and time-consuming preparation techniques and ion-exchange chromatography with challenging chromatographic conditions. Consequently, several approaches have been published to overcome these drawbacks but the knowledge about their suitability for complex matrices such as food and feed is limited. In this paper, we describe the development of two new methods to determine amino acids in food and feed. These methods involve microwave hydrolysis and reversed-phase UHPLC-MS/MS with pre-column derivatization using 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC). Both methods provide streamlined sample preparations and a dramatic reduction in analysis time while offering a high degree of specificity and selectivity. Selectivity also enabled the simultaneous determination of the more uncommon substances hydroxyproline, hydroxylysine, taurine, ornithine, and γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) along with amino acids typically present in food and feed. The results were all satisfactory with regards to sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and comparability with laboratories that use other methods, for example from ISO, AOAC, or regulation (EC) 152/2009. We therefore concluded that both methods provide a reliable and modern approach to overcome many of the drawbacks that occur with the conventional standard methods.
Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Hydrolysis, Aminoquinolines, Amino Acids, Microwaves, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Hydrolysis, Aminoquinolines, Amino Acids, Microwaves, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
