
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4032837
The work proposes policies to improve the environmental sustainability of distributed ledger technology (DLT). While the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus protocol requires large amounts of electricity, several DLT protocols consume much less, while still being sufficiently reliable and decentralized. To move from a PoW protocol to a greener system, such as proof-of-stake (PoS) or proof-of-authority (PoA), the consensus of the majority of miners (measured by their computing power) is required during the transition period to preserve the security requirements. Given that miners have an incentive to maintain the status quo, this paper illustrates various policies designed to bring about the transition. We aim to show that the current policy approach adopted by banking and financial regulators, based on the principle of technological neutrality, may need a reappraisal in order to consider the ‘sustainability’ criterion. Policymakers should not stifle financial innovation; nevertheless they should intervene if technology is a source of negative externalities.
carbon tax, environmental transaction tax, : Computer science [C05] [Engineering, computing & technology], green consensus protocols, DLT, prudential requirements, sustainability, : Sciences informatiques [C05] [Ingénierie, informatique & technologie], financial markets infrastructures, Blockchain, energy consumption, : Gestion des systèmes d'information [B06] [Sciences économiques & de gestion], : Management information systems [B06] [Business & economic sciences]
carbon tax, environmental transaction tax, : Computer science [C05] [Engineering, computing & technology], green consensus protocols, DLT, prudential requirements, sustainability, : Sciences informatiques [C05] [Ingénierie, informatique & technologie], financial markets infrastructures, Blockchain, energy consumption, : Gestion des systèmes d'information [B06] [Sciences économiques & de gestion], : Management information systems [B06] [Business & economic sciences]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
