
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.395561
The poverty impact of indirect tax reforms is analyzed using sequential stochastic dominance methods. This allows agents to differ in dimensions that cannot always be precisely captured within the usual money-metric indicators of living standards. Examples of such dimensions include household size and composition, temporal or spatial variation in price indices, and individual needs and "merits".
Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Equivalence scales, Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Equivalence Scales, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D12, jel: jel:I32, jel: jel:H21
Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Equivalence scales, Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Poverty, Efficiency, Tax Reform, Stochastic Dominance, Equivalence Scales, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D12, jel: jel:I32, jel: jel:H21
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
